June 11th, 2008
Last week I posted about the comments made by Mark Hurst in an interview in Women Entrepreneur magazine, in which he seems to have taken a strong poke at David Allen’s Getting Things Done (GTD) and Tim Ferriss’ Four Hour Work Week (4HWW). GTD and 4HWW are two of my favourite personal productivity books, and I felt that the comments in the interview are examples of negative marketing that serve to promote a product at the expense of others.
To Mark Hurst’s credit he responded in a very even handed manner to Tim Ferriss’ blog post, and was nice enough to shoot me an email to point out the post. I believe he addressed his concerns about the 4HWW approach quite well, also pointing out some aspects that he likes, and did so in a very constructive manner.
He did not however elaborate upon any of the comments he made around GTD, which I believe is the most popular methodology for personal productivity. I would personally like to see more of Mr Hurst’s thoughts expressing why he believes that “David Allen’s approach is a bit of a throwback to a pre-internet age”, and why a process that consists of the following steps is not appropriate
- Setting up and utilising appropriate collection buckets (physical and digital)
- Organise the results
- Process those into appropriate next actions lists
- Reviewing the choices
- Doing
In fact, Mr Hurst’s following comment would seem to indicate that he advocates much the same, when he says “People need to learn how to let the bits go and do a better job of managing their to-do lists“. This is the essence of GTD - managing their lists.
I would like to thank Mark Hurst for his response, and for communicating personally. I would like to invite him to further expand on the above.
BTW, I have ordered his book from Amazon, and will post a review here once I’ve had a chance to read it.
Posted in Personal Productivity | No Comments »